Get off expensive SaaS.
Own the software
that runs your business.
We modernize high-friction CRM, ERP, CMS, and BI workflows with software your team can own and extend. Start with an audit that tests the scope, risk, and economics before a replacement decision.
Modernize the workflows that matter.
Start with a high-friction CRM, reporting, or publishing workflow. The assessment establishes fit, dependencies, owners, and operating risks before any replacement decision.
-
WordPress: Faster. Safer. AI-managed content.
Astro static + headless CMS with an editorial workflow your marketing team can run. Performance, redirects, and content parity are scoped in the audit.
workflow, dependencies, and ownerWordPress · Drupal · JoomlaSee the offer → -
Salesforce & CRM: Stop paying per-seat for software your reps barely open.
Audit the sales workflows your team relies on, scope only the work worth replacing, and plan a phased migration to a system your team can operate.
workflow, dependencies, and ownerSalesforce · HubSpot · PipedriveSee the offer → -
BI & Dashboards: Modern reporting for the decisions that matter.
Audit the reporting decisions, metric definitions, and data sources that matter, then scope a maintainable reporting experience around them.
workflow, dependencies, and ownerTableau · Looker · PowerBISee the offer →
NetSuite and other core systems stay bounded by their control requirements. Tell us which workflow is difficult to operate or change.
Inspect the audit process →A decision you can inspect.
Before recommending a replacement, we map the operating work, costs, and continuity risks. The result is a scoped decision artifact—not a generic software pitch.
CRM operating workflow
- Keep
- Systems that are stable, differentiated, and already owned by the team.
- Improve
- Friction that can be removed without a migration or new operating burden.
- Replace
- Workflows where cost, control, or operating fit supports a phased change.
Spend and contract map
A working inventory of subscriptions, renewal dates, owners, and costs that need verification.
Keep / improve / replace
A decision for each workflow: retain it, improve it in place, or include it in a replacement scope.
Phased implementation plan
Dependencies, data migration, parallel run, handoff ownership, and the assumptions behind the range.
- AWS
- Vercel
- Cloudflare
- OpenAI
- Anthropic
- Hugging Face
- Postgres
- Snowflake
- Next.js
- React
- Stripe
- Shopify
Keep, improve, switch, or assess one workflow.
Six questions, about one minute. Get a neutral next step without a price or savings claim.
We don't just build. We partner.
- [01]
Delivery roles made explicit
The scope identifies the delivery roles, decision owners, access boundaries, and escalation needs for the proposed work. Staffing, locations, and any third-party involvement are discussed before a commercial commitment.
- [02]
Decision-first discovery
A discovery engagement maps the relevant costs, workflows, risks, and ownership requirements before a replacement scope is proposed. It produces a documented decision artifact even when the recommended answer is to stay.
- [03]
Ownership made explicit
Repository access, source-code ownership, operating documentation, continuity requirements, and any escrow terms are agreed in the written scope before launch. The operating model is not inferred from a generic engagement promise.
- [04]
Phased delivery, where needed
The delivery plan identifies the required migration checks, sequencing, ownership, and rollback decision before production change. A parallel run is used where the workflow risk warrants it.
Recent writing.
Practical guides, AI trends, and development insights from the Stack Renew team.
Start with the workflow that matters.
Tell us what is costly, slow, or difficult to change. We’ll review the request and follow up.