WordPress to Astro migration —
faster, safer, AI-managed content.
Astro static + headless CMS with an editorial workflow your marketing team can run. Performance, redirects, and content parity are scoped in the audit.
Static replaces the runtime.
Most marketing-site WordPress installs run a full PHP server to render content that hasn't changed in weeks. Static rebuilds skip the server entirely.
Audit → rebuild → cutover → handoff.
-
A paid discovery engagement inventories the pages, templates, forms, integrations, content, and publishing needs that are in scope. It records what will migrate, redirect, retire, or remain on another system.
-
The agreed pages and templates are rebuilt with a publishing workflow that fits the editorial team. Content migration, redirects, forms, accessibility, and performance requirements are verified against the agreed acceptance checks.
-
The cutover plan defines backups, redirect validation, monitoring, owners, rollback decision, and post-launch checks before production change. Search and analytics checks are completed when the appropriate account access is available.
-
The publishing team receives the agreed access, documentation, preview path, and training. Ongoing support and ownership are set before launch.
Replace the workflow, not the parts that already work.
The audit defines the migration scope, ownership, acceptance checks, and rollback path before a build is proposed.
-
Who it fits
Marketing teams with a clear publishing owner, a content inventory, and a need for a simpler, faster site operation than their current WordPress installation supports.
-
What stays
Domains, analytics, CRM, forms, and editorial tools remain in place unless the audit identifies a specific replacement or integration required for the new publishing flow.
-
Operating risks to plan
Plan URL and redirect coverage, content and media parity, search visibility, form behavior, permissions, editorial training, monitored cutover, and a usable rollback path.
-
When to stay
Keep WordPress when its maintenance burden is proportionate, its editorial workflow already works, and its plugins support essential functionality that a replacement would not improve.
Other workflows to assess — related SaaS replacement offers.
Start with the workflow that matters.
Tell us what is costly, slow, or difficult to change. We’ll review the request and follow up.